Next: 6.4 Stacking of GAIA
Up: 6. Simulation and Stacking
Previous: 6.2.3 Noise
  Contents
6.3 Simulation of GAIA BBP Observations
Under our assumptions, the simulation of a GAIA BBP observation on the basis of
an HST WFPC2 image essentially involves translation and rotation of the
original image, scaling to GAIA exposure time and rebinning into GAIA samples
of HST WFPC2 electron counts, image smearing due to GAIA PSF and noise.
Step by step, the procedure for the generation of a single simulated
observation consists of the following steps:
- Retrieval of HST electron counts: HST data number counts are
retrieved from the fits file provided by the HDA and then converted to
HST electron counts using the analog-to-digital conversion gain taken
from [Biretta et al. 1996].
- Subpixeling of HST image: in order to partly recover the resolution of the
HST image which would otherwise be lost due to the undersampling of the PSF,
each HST pixel is considered as consisting of a mosaic of four square
subpixels, ``containing'' one fourth of the pixel's electron counts each and
whose centers are displaced from the pixel's center as shown in
Figure 6.4.
Figure 6.4:
Subpixeling of HST image. The central square on the left marks the pixel's
center, whereas the four squares on the right mark the subpixels' centers.
|
- Conversion to GAIA electron counts: GAIA electron counts for a single scan are
calculated from HST electron counts by taking into account the different
exposure time, and assuming the same electron count rate for the two
instruments (see Subsection 6.2.1).
- Translation and rotation of HST subpixels: since GAIA observation will in
general be obtained at a different position and position angle with respect to
the original HST image, once the desired observation center and scan direction
have been determined the HST subpixels are translated and rotated accordingly.
- Rebinning of HST subpixels into GAIA samples: each HST subpixel electron count
is assigned to the sample containing its center.
- Convolution with GAIA PSF: the observation is convolved with the PSF described
in Subsection 6.2.2.
The convolution is computed using a Fourier transform technique, namely
calculating the product of the Fourier transforms of the observation and the
PSF and then calculating the inverse Fourier transform of the result.
Note that the PSFs obtained in Subsection 6.2.2 are sampled with a
step of 1/4 pixel along both directions, and therefore need to be resampled
and renormalized before convolution.
- Noise addition: to simulate signal noise we calculated a Poisson deviate of
the observation, whereas to simulate readnoise we added to it a Gaussian
distribution with zero mean and standard deviation equal to GAIA rms readnoise
as calculated in Section 5.5.
Following this procedure, a single GAIA BBP observation is simulated.
When generating a realistic all-mission set of simulated observations
of a given sky region, however, one has to take into account that in general
the different observations will have different centers as well as different
scan directions.
A set of observation centers, with coordinates in general in the range
, where is the adopted sample size along
one of the two axes, and the corresponding set of scan directions, with
position angles in general in the range
, must therefore
be generated.
The procedure described above can then be applied to each desired combination
of center and scan direction.
In the simulations presented in Chapter 7 and in
Appendix E, a conservative number of 50 scans was assumed.
Note that this is the minimum number of times an Astro will scan any sky
region during a 5-year mission, according to Figure 2.3.
To a first approximation, the observation centers and scan directions can be
taken as randomly distributed, but note that while the first assumption is
likely to be verified fairly strictly, this may not always be the case for the
second one.
The consequences of possible preferred scan directions are therefore described
in Section 7.5.
Next: 6.4 Stacking of GAIA
Up: 6. Simulation and Stacking
Previous: 6.2.3 Noise
  Contents
Mattia Vaccari
2000-12-05